Data Presentation for the 26k Microarray Project


table S1.  Microarray data analysis using a linear model.  Each experiment consisted of four dye-swaps and eight slides as described in the Methods and shown below.  The analyzed data can be viewed in a “scatter plot” or “text”.

Experiment 1

At4 vs. Aa (leaves)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)

Experiment 2

Allo733 vs. PM (leaves)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)

Experiment 3

Allo738 vs. PM (leaves)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)

Experiment 4

Allo733 vs. PM (flower buds)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)

Experiment 5

Allo738 vs. PM (flower buds)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)
Experiment 6

At2 vs. At4 (leaves)

Common Variance

(Plot, Text)

Per-gene Variance

(Plot, Text)

Shared Gene List (Text)

Notes.

1. In each experiment, a text-delineated table of the significant genes detected is displayed.  For example, in experiment 1 for the comparison of gene expression between A. thaliana and A. arenosa in leaves, the list included 4,363 and 11,199 significant genes using common and per-gene variance, respectively.  The list was tabulated using locus ID and logarithm-fold changes.

2. The microarray data were generated using procedures provided by MIAME (http://www.mged.org/Workgroups/MIAME/miame.html).  The data were obtained from five experiments as shown below.  The detailed procedures for microarray and experimental design, slide printing, hybridization, targets (cDNA probes), data collection, and analysis were described in a previous paper 19.  The data can be down-loaded for re-analysis or verification of data analysis using other statistical packages or commercial software in addition to the linear model used in this study.

3. Raw data (spot quantitation matrix) were generated using a GenePix 4000B scanner and GenePix Pro4.1 software (Axon Instruments).  The data obtained from each slide will be displayed after clicking the slide number.

4. The raw data (hybridization intensities obtained in Cy3 and Cy5 channels) were converted using the logarithm function and subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) as described in the Methods section.  No additional step of data processing was used.


table S2. Microarray experimental design

table S2a. Microarray analysis of gene expression in leaves between two parents, A. thaliana (At4) and A. arenosa (Aa).

Slide No.

Leaf RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

1

RNA1

At4

Aa

1

1

2

RNA1

Aa

At4

1

1

3

RNA1

At4

Aa

2

2

4

RNA1

Aa

At4

2

2

5

RNA2

At4

Aa

1

3

6

RNA2

Aa

At4

1

3

7

RNA2

At4

Aa

2

4

8

RNA2

Aa

At4

2

4

table S2b. Microarray analysis of gene expression in leaves between Allo733 and parental mix.

Slide No.

Leaf RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

9

RNA1

Allo733

PM

1

1

10

RNA1

PM

Allo733

1

1

11

RNA1

Allo733

PM

2

2

12

RNA1

PM

Allo733

2

2

13

RNA2

Allo733

PM

1

3

14

RNA2

PM

Allo733

1

3

15

RNA2

Allo733

PM

2

4

16

RNA2

PM

Allo733

2

4

table S2c. Microarray analysis of gene expression in leaves between Allo738 and parental mix.

Slide No.

Leaf RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

17

RNA1

Allo738

PM

1

1

18

RNA1

PM

Allo738

1

1

19

RNA1

Allo738

PM

2

2

20

RNA1

PM

Allo738

2

2

21

RNA2

Allo738

PM

1

3

22

RNA2

PM

Allo738

1

3

23

RNA2

Allo738

PM

2

4

24

RNA2

PM

Allo738

2

4

table s2d. Microarray analysis of gene expression in flowers between Allo733 and parental mix.

Slide No.

Flower bud RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

25

RNA1

Allo733

PM

1

1

26

RNA1

PM

Allo733

1

1

27

RNA1

Allo733

PM

2

2

28

RNA1

PM

Allo733

2

2

29

RNA2

Allo733

PM

1

3

30

RNA2

PM

Allo733

1

3

31

RNA2

Allo733

PM

2

4

32

RNA2

PM

Allo733

2

4

table S2e. Microarray analysis of gene expression in flowers between Allo738 and parental mix.

Slide No.

Flower bud RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

33

RNA1

Allo738

PM

1

1

34

RNA1

PM

Allo738

1

1

35

RNA1

Allo738

PM

2

2

36

RNA1

PM

Allo738

2

2

37

RNA2

Allo738

PM

1

3

38

RNA2

PM

Allo738

1

3

39

RNA2

Allo738

PM

2

4

40

RNA2

PM

Allo738

2

4

table S2f. Microarray analysis of gene expression in leaves between A. thaliana diploid (At2) and autotetraploid (At4).

Slide No.

Flower bud RNA

Cy3

Cy5

Printing Pattern

Dye-swap

41

RNA1

At2

At4

1

1

42

RNA1

At4

At2

1

1

43

RNA1

At2

At4

2

2

44

RNA1

At4

At2

2

2

45

RNA2

At2

At4

1

3

46

RNA2

At4

At2

1

3

47

RNA2

At2

At4

2

4

48

RNA2

At4

At2

2

4

 

 



table S3.  RT-PCR analysis of candidate genes detected by microarray analysis.

Locus

TAIR description

Symbol

RNA (UW)

RNA (TAMU)

Ratio (At4/Aa)

Ratio (Allo733/Mix)

Ratio (Allo738/Mix)

RT-PCR fragment

(bp)

Primer sequences

AT5G56030

heat shock protein 81-2 (HSP81-2)

HSP90

+

+

0.90406

-0.6977

-0.87724

499

F: 5'-TGTCTCTGCAACCAAGGAAGGTC-3’

R: 5'-ATCGGCTTCAACAACATCATCGT-3’

AT5G12020

heat shock protein 17.6-II

HSP17.6b

+

-

1.4619

-1.02

-1.8317

494

F: 5'-CCGAAGACCACAACAACGAGAAG-3’

R: 5'-CCTCACGCATTCCGATTACATTC-3’

AT1G80840

WRKY family transcription factor

WRKY40

+

+

1.9652

-2.5912

-2.4936

465

F: 5’-GAAGATCCACCGACAAGTGCTTT-3’

R: 5’-TTTGACAGAACAGCTTGGAGCAC-3’

AT1G19610

plant defensin protein, putative (PDF1.4)

PDF1.4

+

+

1.0466

-0.60814

-0.57314

360

F: 5’-CCTTTGCCTCTCCATCTTCCTTA-3’

R: 5’-TCAAAGAAAATTCCCAAAAACCAA-3’

AT1G75830

plant defensin protein, putative (PDF1.1)

PDF1.1

+

+

-2.1055

0.83476

0.90425

322

F: 5’-CGCTGCTCTTGTTTTCTTTGCT-3’

R: 5’-AAACAAAGCAACATAACATATCTGG-3’

AT2G43590

glycosyl hydrolase family 19 (Chitinase)

CHI

+

+

n.s.

0.7796

0.89841

471

F: 5’-CGTAACTACTGCCAGAGCAGCAA-3’

R: 5’-GAACACCGAGACCCGACATAAAG-3’

AT3G15210

ethylene responsive element binding factor 4 (AtERF4)

ATERF4

+

+

0.97404

-1.021

-1.079

433

F: 5’-GACCCACAATAATGCCAAGGA-3’

R: 5’-TACGTTACCGATCCCCATCAG-3’

AT5G20230

blue copper binding protein

BCB

+

-

2.7399

-3.1919

-2.2944

599

F: 5’-GAAAAGGGGGTGACCTGAGTTCT-3’

R: 5’-AGCGACCAGAAAAGTAGCACCAC-3’

AT5G54190

NADPH:protochlorophyllide oxidoreductase

PORA

-

-

-0.9472

1.7914

0.78946

455

F: 5’-AAACCATTTGGGCCACTTTCTT-3’

R: 5’-CAAGTCTTTTCCCAGCCTCTGA

AT4G27440

protochlorophyllide reductase precursor

PORB

+

+

-1.2321

2.0486

2.189

433

F: 5’-ACCAAATCAAATCCGAACATGG-3’

R: 5’-GGCTCTTTAGCTGTCGGGAAAT-3’

AT3G46970

starch phosphorylase, putative

SPP

+

+

n.s.

1.0583

1.5007

499

F: 5’-GAAATTTGGGAGATAAGCGATGG-3’

R: 5’-ATAACCCCAAGCAGGCAGATTTA-3’

At3G02380

CONSTANS-like 2 (COL2)

COL2

+

+

0.77842

-0.71412

-0.73129

436

F: 5’-ACCACCTGTGATGCTCGAGTT-3’

R: 5’-CTCCTCCAAAGCTCCTCTGGT-3’

AT5G10140

MADS box protein FLOWERING LOCUS F (FLF)

FLC

+

+

-0.6118

0.78811

0.55986

617

F: 5’-AAATTAGGGCACAAAGCCCTCTC-3’

R: 5’-GTAGTGGGAGAGTCACCGGAAGA-3’

AT5G09810

Actin 2

Act2

+

+

n.s.

n.s.

n.s.

656

F: 5'-CTCATGAAGATTCTCACTGAG-3’

R: 5'-ACAACAGATAGTTCAATTCCCA-3’

 

Note: “+” matched microarray data; “-” did not match microarray data; “n.s.”: not significant; P-values associated with each gene are omitted in this table but displayed in table S1; Ratios shown are logarithm-fold changes in microarray analysis